Check out this quote from The Denver Daily News.
This snippet is Doug Kelley (director of animal control in Denver) defending the “system”.
Doug Kelley, director of animal
control, defended the system yesterday, arguing that the appeals process is
proof that it works.
“The administrative hearing process is
there, it’s designed to allow owners to appeal,” he said. “That process worked
in this case — the dog, upon further information, was found not to be a pit
bull. So, that’s why the process is there.”
Kelley also defended the training
animal control officers receive in order to label a dog.
The training is actually a voluntary
program that animal control officers must opt into. The checklist to determine
if a dog is a pit bull is almost entirely physical characteristics, such as
lips, eye color and shoulders. If a dog matches the majority of criteria for a
pit bull, then the dog is a pit bull in the eyes of city officials.
Critics of the system, however, point
out that there are dozens of traits that can be applied to several breeds. In
many cases, the evaluators are unable to agree on several of the criteria.
Training for breed identification? No such thing! You can’t identify something that is fictitious. “Pitbull” is a slang term for a non-purebred dog or cross bred dog.
Checklist… see previous post! Opinion based descriptions.
Identify the following pictures on Denver’s “pitbull” checklist. Just open the attachment on the previous post and keep it open so you can do your own checklist of each of the animals below. See if you come up with a similar result for the following animals.
Animal number 1.
Animal number 2.
Animal number 3.